I understood it!
Within my previous post here, I'd expressed some healthy skepticism about companies letting a variant of Windows to auto update to them.
It was a couple of days past in the article titled .
Interesting.
Here is what I said:
The component that is likely to be really fascinating to me will be how is Microsoft going to balance rapid updating with regression testing and due diligence?
Windows is a huge business with billions of customers and millions of businesses depending on it.
One lousy upgrade or even a couple of updates that are awful could cripple thousands of PC's around the world.
The major challenge with rapid upgrades is not just attempting to regression evaluation against Windows + hundreds of third party programs that are popular although testing their sectional upgrade against the rest of Windows.
Well that seems to confirm my feelings.
Microsoft is now communicating that there are going to be two distinct styles for upgrades, based totally on customer option:Opt-in - This mode means that Windows 10 will be upgraded on a fast-moving pace (i.e., when Microsoft rolls 'em out). This is described as a consumer-kind updating mode. These include fixes and security updates, but also new attributes and OS updates. Lock-down - Locked-down mode is for mission critical environments (i.e., companies) where updates are managed centrally. This will definitely work just like the way things occur now and won't include only security updates, attribute updates and fixes. Organizations will still be able to utilize their standard patching mechanisms since updates will still be delivered to WSUS servers.
Umm, which one do you think businesses will probably adopt?
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét